Randtherpkelu Admin replied

344 weeks ago




Hindi What Happened To Monday








Show Spoiler

a5c7b9f00b The year is 2073, where overpopulation, limited fossil fuels and global food shortage have led to the biggest crisis in human history and the enforcement of the strict mandatory one-child-per-family policy, called the "Child Allocation Act". Under those circumstances, the ruthless political activist Nicolette Cayman promises a bright future in a brave new world, while at the same time, Terrence Settman decides to get around the government's decree, in a desperate attempt to hide his septuplet grandchildren. As a result, the siblings named after each day of the week will inevitably take turns impersonating their late mother, Karen Settman, going out in the world only on the corresponding days of the week, sharing information with the rest of the sisterhood every night. And then, one day, something happens to Monday.
In a not so distant future, where overpopulation and famine have forced governments to undertake a drastic One-Child Policy, seven identical sisters (all of them portrayed by Noomi Rapace) live a hide-and-seek existence pursued by the Child Allocation Bureau. The Bureau, directed by the fierce Nicolette Cayman (Glenn Close), enforces a strict family-planning agenda that the sisters outwit by taking turns assuming the identity of one person: Karen Settman. Taught by their grandfather (Willem Dafoe) who raised and named them - Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday and Sunday - each can go outside once a weektheir common identity, but are only free to be themselves in the prison of their own apartment. That is until, one day, Monday does not come home.
Where do we start? Maybe by acknowledging the limits of IMDb's review section. It's becoming more and more clear that the section is susceptible to be swarmed by a cyber-army of production/distribution offices interns or bots-for-rent commentators, an industry, I'm sure, that is in full growth. How to explain then, all these 8 to 10 ratings for such a half baked product. For sure, there's a big range of specimens out there,seen with all the Marvel Universe gorged geniuses that would give a 1 or 2 rating on the last 2 films of Denis Villeneuve. Even if you hated the movies, which is your absolute right, you can't ignore the mastery that was involved in the making of Arrival and BR2049 and by giving such a low rating, the only ones that end up looking bad are the cretins who are showing the world what they are. In this case, even with poor writing and execution (in direction), I gave first a 5, because of the decent artistic direction, but downgraded it to 4 after all, because the writing is that bad. But a 6.9 rating after 35K votes is a little mind boggling, because it is not that good a movie.
I honestly don't understand the bad reviews behind this film. I'm writing this, nota review of the events or themes that take place; but rather, a questioning of expectations from the average film viewer. <br/><br/>It should be fairly obvious that to enjoy any motion picture, one must enable their sense of disbelief. This means when you watch a fantasy film or show you don't question the reality of wands, spells, dragons, etc. Instead, you allow yourself to be immersed within the story. After all, the entire point of art is to transport yourself within the world of the artist. <br/><br/>I take issue with criticism from professional critics to the average person on the basis of "realism," "continuity," and/or any other tropes related to the experience of (in this case film), art.<br/><br/>This movie uses certain themes that have a major impact in the possible near futureits basis for storytelling, and therefore, I can see why some might attempt to hold the themesa basis to grade its merits. <br/><br/>I must contest this thoughI would say you don't read an Asimov, Clarke, Dick, novel and complain that your predictions of the future aren't the samethe author's do you? While watching this I'm reminded of my experience of watching "Minority Report" and it's safe to say that that version of the future hasn't come close to existing yet, but nonetheless it's a masterful bit of storytelling. The point though is this, sure there are holes in almost any plot, especially in films that don't coincide with our present day notions of reality; but what has that to do with our ability to enjoy a film?<br/><br/>Be honest with yourself for a moment, when you're watching anything but a documentary (and even then..) you're primary concern is the entertainment value. To which, this film delivers in spades. <br/><br/>There's great drama, great action, great acting, and one person playing 7 roles. What more could you ask for? Anyone who denigrates this film, I have to know, what are your expectations, and what are your favorite films? <br/><br/>8/18/17 23:38
It may have its failings but it is never less than entertaining.

Another 48 Hrs. movie download in mp4Battle of the Stars - Part 2 movie in tamil dubbed downloadThe Iron Giant 720p moviesChor Lauheung malayalam full movie free downloadMercy Plane full movie hd 1080p downloadThe Jurassic Games online freeFirestarter full movie download mp4The Phantom Speaks full movie hd downloadTail on the Air full movie in hindi 720p downloadTokyo Ghoul movie free download in hindi


last edited 266 weeks ago by Randtherpkelu
Please log in to post a reply.